By Type:
Table of contents:
The Strengthening Management and Governance programme aims to develop strong and effective institutional governance and management capacity in established Māori organisations and businesses contracted to deliver government services.1 The programme was developed by Te Puni Kōkiri at a time when public and political scrutiny was heavily focused on Māori organisations delivering, or failing to deliver, government-funded health, welfare, education and justice programmes. Te Puni Kōkiri regards the SMG programme as a means of increasing the capacity of established Māori organisations by assisting them to:
The SMG programme aims to achieve four key high level outcomes:
To achieve these outcomes, the SMG programme assists Māori organisations by providing an independent organisational analysis and, where required, assists them with tailored interventions to enhance or improve their performance.
The key component of the SMG programme is the provision of an independent report to Māori organisations on their operating performance in key governance and management areas. Te Puni Kōkiri contracts external consultants (assessors) to undertake independent assessments of organisations. Six assessor organisations have been engaged as preferred providers to the SMG programme.
Te Puni Kōkiri selects and assigns assessors to work with organisations based on a preliminary (informal) match of the assessors’ skills and the requirements of organisations.
The assessments are based on a standardised, yet flexible, framework that assessors follow to identify strengths and specific gaps in the organisations’ governance and management practices. From this analysis, the assessors recommend areas for improvement and practical solutions. The assessments are voluntary – organisations decide if they wish to participate – and full assessment reports are confidential to the organisation. Te Puni Kōkiri receives only a summary copy of the key findings due to the confidential and commercially sensitive nature of the report contents.
The second component of the SMG programme is the provision of remedial support to organisations that completed the initial assessment process. The purpose of the remedial support is to address the areas for improvement identified in the assessors’ reports. This phase is achieved through limited funding support from Te Puni Kōkiri or the facilitation and brokering of assistance from other government funders. In this phase, organisations are able to choose who undertakes the remedial work. The majority of organisations choose to have the remedial work but some choose not to. Some advised that they will undertake remedial work as their timeframes and resources allow.
Although the programme is voluntary in nature, Māori organisations are required to meet certain criteria to be eligible for the SMG programme. Organisations are required to be in either the ‘development’ or ‘established’ stage of the business lifecycle; have significant responsibilities for service delivery and/or asset management; and have a minimum annual income of $300,000 in government service contracts.
When the programme was first introduced, the qualifying threshold was an income of $800,000 per annum. The lowering of the threshold has allowed more organisations to enter the programme. Proactive targeting by Te Puni Kōkiri of organisations with development needs (such as Māori radio stations) has enabled a wider catchment of Māori organisations to participate in the programme.
Since the inception of the SMG programme, Te Puni Kōkiri has invested in excess of $4 million in the programme.
On average, each assessment costs approximately $20,000 (including disbursements of up to a maximum of $5,000).
The table below provides an overview of the key project milestones for the SMG programme.
The June 2005 evaluation report3 found that the SMG programme was widely supported by organisations and assessors. The report identified critical factors leading to the success of the SMG programme. These included: the programme’s non-compulsory nature; the quality of the assessors and their reports, and the respect assessors showed towards the tikanga, kawa and kaupapa of organisations. The report also noted the willingness of Te Puni Kōkiri to adapt the programme where necessary.
The report noted that it was too early to make any definitive statements about the achievement of the programme outcomes and that these outcomes would only be visible after a longer period of time. However, some outcomes were evident and these included:
The report also identified areas for improvement. Some of these included:
Overall, the evaluation found that the assessment phase was popular, the assessor reports were valid and accurate, and the remediation phase needed to be improved.
1 CAB Min (03) 30/6 refers. 2 Paper to Cabinet Social Development Committee, 24 July 2003, p1. 3 Te Puni Kōkiri (2005).