PEKE ATU KI TE RĀRANGI TAKE MATUA / TIROHANGA REREKĒTANGA NUI
Ngā Tānga Kupu

Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2011

Output Performance Measures and Standards

Actual
Standard
2009/10
Performance Measures Actual
Standard
2010/11
Budget
Standard
2010/11
  Kāitoko Whānau and Oranga Whānau Programmes:
Manage the Whānau Social Assistance programme to place a number of Whānau Advocates (community workers) into Māori communities; referred to as Kāitoko Whānau and Oranga Whānau
     
50 and 21 respectively Number of Kāitoko Whānau workers & Oranga Whānau workers engaged to work with vulnerable Māori and whānau 50 Kāitoko Whānau and 21 Oranga Whānau workers are in place Average of 50 and 21 respectively  
Not Applicable Vulnerable whānau are connected to appropriate and essential support services 730 Whānau referrals were connected to support services, consisting of approximately 2107 individuals as at 30 June 2011 Minimum of 1,000 whānau by 31 December 2010  
  Māori Wardens Programme:
A programme to enhance the capacity and capability of Māori Wardens through enhanced training and improved resources
     
7 Regional co-ordinators are in place to support Māori Wardens in undertaking their community level social assistance role 7 Regional Coordinators in place Average of 7 Regional Coordinators in place during the year  
Framework in place Feb. 2010 Establish a nationwide training framework for Māori Wardens Completed, framework is focusing on delivering basics needed to enable Warden to operate to a standard Achieve NZQA - unit standard  
259 Undertake Māori Warden training (across course offerings) Over 400 have attended training courses 250 to 300 attend courses  
Not Applicable Māori Wardens gain NZQA - unit standards from accredited training courses attended 86% have been accredited 75% to 80% of attendees  
60% Māori Wardens (warranted) have been allocated uniforms and have access to the appropriate safety equipment whilst on duty 86% 70% to 75%  
Not Applicable Māori Wardens regional groups are satisfied with the level of regional coordination provided through the programme on a scale of 1 to 5 No formal survey, assessment of 3 based on the feedback via monthly reports from regional coordinators Overall score of no less than 3