By Type:
Table of contents:
Overall, the SMG programme was rated positively by organisations and assessors. Both groups reported that involvement with the programme was beneficial for the organisations.
The evaluation set out to achieve three key objectives:
The SMG programme was effective in providing advice and strategies to address key governance issues. Governance was considered by the assessors to be an area that was often neglected, with organisations tending to focus more at an operational level.
The evaluation identified that the SMG programme has been instrumental in enhancing the operations and performance of boards through:
These improvements built confident boards, leading to better decision making and stronger organisational cohesion. Efficiency and effectiveness gains through more productive meetings and better knowledge and understanding of their operating environments have contributed to lifting the overall performance of organisations.
Organisations made significant gains in the governance area; however, there is still an ongoing need to provide support and assistance to boards. Issues highlighted as significant risks for organisations included the voluntary nature of boards, their inability to remunerate members at realistic levels for their time and effort, and representation on boards based on kinship rather than competency.
The SMG programme also made significant gains in improving organisations’ management processes and systems. Improvement in human resources, financial management, business planning and risk management processes enabled organisations to strengthen and consolidate their positions.
The evaluation highlighted that many organisations were enjoying increased levels of confidence. Organisations were aware that their communities and funders demonstrated increased levels of confidence in them, as measured by increased numbers of contracts, increased financial turnover and growth in client numbers.