By Type:
Table of contents:
The Minister purchased outputs that were designed to ensure the efficient and effective management of operational programmes that were administered by Te Puni Kōkiri.
Quality, quantity and timeliness performance measures for Ministerial servicing are reported under Ministerial servicing Performance in this report.
All work produced was aligned to the statement of intent 2006/07 where our approach was to enable Māori to participate and succeed as Māori. In 2006/07 Te Puni Kōkiri delivered a number of funding programmes to groups.
These included:
In 2006/2007 $3.386m was expensed (from a departmental budget of $3.300m).
Implementation of KAR commenced on 1 July 2002 after the merger of the Tahua Kaihoatu and Specialist Advisor funds in March 2002. The funding streams supported positively assigned Māori Development Workers responding directly to Māori development who were:
A total of 40 KAR development investments were targeted and 54 Māori Development worker investment projects were in place in 2006/07. The programme is responding directly in advancing Māori development, working together with whānau, hapū, iwi, Māori organisations and communities and also serving to reduce inequalities.
In 2006/07 $2.651m was expensed (from a $2.911m departmental budget) where the objectives of the KNR programme were to:
The programme consisted of development workers and mentors spread among the ten regional offices to assist communities to access information and support them in its use.
Highlights in 2006/07 included:
In 2006/07 $0.456m was expensed (from a $0.456m departmental budget). Eleven housing projects were supported with SHAZ operational funding.
The primary objective of the SHAZ Programme was to resolve serious housing need within a designated Special Housing Action Zone by facilitating and resourcing a hapū, iwi, and/or an appropriate community response.
A secondary objective was to ensure each housing intervention produced at least one parallel intervention relevant to the Government’s social policy goals, such as, improved health, employment or training opportunities for hapū, iwi, and local community members, and reducing inequalities.
The Māori Potential Fund came into effect from 1 July 2006, when the non-departmental appropriations for 7 programmes were collapsed into three new Non-Departmental Output Expenses: Mātauranga (knowledge/skills), Rawa (Resources) and Whakamana (Leadership). The purpose of the Fund is to make outcomes-based investments that realise Māori potential by enabling improved life quality for Māori.
During 2006/07 Te Puni Kokiri made over 410 investments through the Māori Potential Fund. Investment areas included ‘Marae and Land Development’, ‘Māori Tourism’, ‘Family Violence Prevention’, ‘Te Reo Māori’ and the ‘Creative Sector’.
New systems and processes were put in place for administration of the Māori Potential Fund, including development of a set of key principles to guide investment decisions and revision of the Ministry’s Operations Manual. During 2007/08 Te Puni Kōkiri will further refine its investment approach as learnings become available from the first year of the Fund’s operation.
In 2006/07 $0.160m was expensed (from $0.175m appropriated) to support 12 Māori Regional Tourism Organisations.
The purpose of this fund was to assist MRTO to:
The tourism sector has been a key focus for Te Puni Kōkiri. It has shown significant growth over the last three years and developed an infrastructure of 12 Māori regional tourism organisations (MRTOs) – working with and representing Māori tourism businesses - and a national body, which has become involved in developing policy and working closely with government and providing a national strategic oversight to Māori tourism. There are now over 350 Māori tourism businesses registered with the New Zealand Māori Tourism Council (NZMTC).
The performance standard required work to be produced to the satisfaction of whānau, hapū, iwi, Māori communities and Māori organisations, with compliance of the programme funding criteria and contract management policy and standards.
These processes superseded our initial intention to measure increased satisfaction through formal surveys in all regional offices.
Work was produced that complied with programme funding criteria and contract management policy and standards.
The performance required all specified reporting deadlines to be assessed against deadlines set in the regional plans.
The specified deliverables in the regional plans were assessed by comparison against deadlines set and modified during the course of the year.
(figures are GST exclusive)